Saturday, December 7, 2013

Controversy with Greenpeace




Unilever has also been scrutinized for their contribution to major environmental issues. Greenpeace launched a campaign in 2008, demanding Unilever to take responsibility for the destruction of the Indonesian rainforests; caused by the use of palm oil in their products—targeting Dove in particular.

Although palm oil is found in a majority of skin care products from Unilever and other companies, according to Greenpeace (2008), Unilever is one of the biggest buyers of palm oil.
It appears that Greenpeace targeted Dove because of their strong positioning as being a “wholesome” brand, standing up for women’s causes. This made them an easy target, to expose the fact that this “conscientious” product is actually a major contributor of deforestation. Greenpeace used a satirical approach to their campaign by using Dove’s campaign for real beauty to bring awareness to the deforestation in Indonesia.







Greenpeace’s clever campaign proved to be very successful, because in just two weeks time enough public pressure built-up and Unilever responded (Greenpeace 2008).  Unilever decided to take action by supporting Greenpeace in the fight against deforestation. Unilever agreed to an immediate suspension on deforestation for palm oil in South East Asia (Greenpeace 2008). Unilever will utilize their influence in the industry to assertively build a coalition of companies to support the moratorium, as well as putting pressure on their suppliers (Greenpeace 2008). Additionally, they agreed to lobby the Indonesian government in order to gain more support towards the immediate suspension of deforestation (Greenpeace 2008).

While Unilever is guilty of being a major contributor to the deforestation in Indonesia, due to the purchasing of large quantities of palm oil, they are certainly not the only company. Palm oil is found in a multitude of skin care products and many companies are guilty of contributing to the deforestation. However, Dove was targeted for Greenpeace’s campaign to bring awareness to this environmental issue. Although this created negative media for Dove, Unilever was very reactive in responding to Greenpeace. This demonstrated their willingness to cooperate and take initiative in supporting this cause, which in turn generated a more positive brand image. Within two weeks of the initial launch of the campaign against Dove, Unilever had agreed to take proactive measures to fight for the cause. This creates positive attention for Unilever, because now they are featured on the Greenpeace website as being proactive in the cause. 

                                                                                                                      L.M

References:

Greenpeace International. (2009) Public pressure for Indonesia's forests works, Ask Unilever. Retrieved November 12, 2013 from http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/campaigns/forests/asia-pacific/dove-palmoil-action/
Pictures:

Tracy. (2008)Greenpeace International. Unilever takes the lead to stop deforestation in Indonesia. Retrieved November 12, 2013 from http://www.greenpeace.org.uk/blog/climate/unilever-takes-the-lead-to-stop-deforestation-in-indonesia-20080515

Hill, E. (2008). Greenpeace International. Stop Dove destroying forests for palm oil.

No comments:

Post a Comment